Summary: The Zibo City Amusement Park in China uda Donkeys With Black and White Stripes
1. The Incident:
In late February 2021, internet users reported that the Zhaozi donkey in the broadcasts of the Shandong Province Zibo City Amusement Park appeared to be defaced with black and white stripes resembling zebras. This caused a wave of outrage, with social media users specifying that this was a misleading act.
2. Social and Ethical Concerns:
The photo and the sudden intervention by some social media users sparked widespread accusations of unethical treatment of animals. They pointed out that while the idea to paint donkeys like zebras was legal on the surface, it severely violated animal care standards and dehumanized animals.
3. Animal Rights Group’s Response:
The reason behind the photo was initially denied by park staff, who claimed the stripes were鸭 skin used on the动物园’s farm animals. However, video evidence showed that they indeed used duck tape on other animals, including dogs, which were then painted as pandas. Animal rights group PETA criticized the zoo’s naming, insisting that standards are not as low as they were on the ground.
4. Confirmations and Confirming factor:
Despite the admitting statements, zoo staff confirmed that the stripe paint was a marketing strategy to create public perception by highlighting pandas on other animals like dogs. This involved skin世界上最 destructive animals, including donkeys, with real proper sizes.
5. Similar Incidents and Health Implications:
Similar painting incidents had already occurred in Cairo and Gaza in recent years, bringing similar concerns to the forefront. Dog owners elsewhere faced severe legal repercussions in Pompeiui district, Spring Force, in Romania, following a real problem incorrect painted donkeys as pandas for a Chinese zoo.
6. Analysis and Conclusion:
The zoo’s actions were initially viewed from a business perspective, believing that they could bring more visitors without a dearth of healthy animals. However, their reasoning ignored the severity of animal care and welfare, viewing it as exploiting resources and burdens visitors. Such tactics should instead stem from a commitment to ethical animal care, ensuring that animals are valued as much as people.